![Simplify your JavaScript – Use .map(), .reduce(), and .filter() | by Etienne Talbot | poka-techblog | Medium Simplify your JavaScript – Use .map(), .reduce(), and .filter() | by Etienne Talbot | poka-techblog | Medium](https://miro.medium.com/max/1200/1*mG4yPf0dVoBk0R6csThChQ.png)
Simplify your JavaScript – Use .map(), .reduce(), and .filter() | by Etienne Talbot | poka-techblog | Medium
![JavaScript Kingdom on Twitter: "map/filter/reduce as simple than you think. #javascript #nodejs #reactjs #Angular #ionic #vuejs #preact #typescript #webdevelopment #web #jquery https://t.co/nTcf6scaOs" / Twitter JavaScript Kingdom on Twitter: "map/filter/reduce as simple than you think. #javascript #nodejs #reactjs #Angular #ionic #vuejs #preact #typescript #webdevelopment #web #jquery https://t.co/nTcf6scaOs" / Twitter](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuwNNCiWwAADdpG.jpg)
JavaScript Kingdom on Twitter: "map/filter/reduce as simple than you think. #javascript #nodejs #reactjs #Angular #ionic #vuejs #preact #typescript #webdevelopment #web #jquery https://t.co/nTcf6scaOs" / Twitter
![Rupert 'fildon' McKay on Twitter: "Simplify your .reduce calls by doing as much work as possible in .filter and .map instead. Compare these two snippets. Which is more readable? Notice that when Rupert 'fildon' McKay on Twitter: "Simplify your .reduce calls by doing as much work as possible in .filter and .map instead. Compare these two snippets. Which is more readable? Notice that when](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E2B7-2WXMAQX_GA.png)